Is Quantitative the Only Future of Risk Management?

Quantitative methods for understanding how risk and uncertainty impacts the organization is a subject I’ve been focusing on more this year. Without a doubt, modeling, Monte Carlo simulation, and other advanced math-based methods can be a valuable tool for helping decision-makers in certain companies.

Many risk management thought leaders, including some I quote often like Hans Læssøe, strongly endorse a quantitative-based approach as the only way to provide risk insights to executives, managers, and the Board.

The recent Risk Awareness Week 2020 featured many speakers who advocate this approach, including conference organizer Alexei Sidorenko.

As he explains in a session entitled Risk Management 2.0, concepts like probability theory, neuroscience, and others have been around in one form or another for several centuries. Although not developed specifically for risk management, these techniques are also useful for managing risks and understanding how uncertainty will impact the achievement of objectives with the ultimate goal of improving decision-making.

Risk management standards like ISO 31000 and COSO have little to no mention of these methods, rendering them obsolete or, as Alexei puts it, “window dressing lacking of substance.”

While quantitative methods will certainly play a major role in the future of risk management, they must also be approached with caution.

Shortly after the New Year, I published a post on what companies must have first before embarking utilizing quantitative risk analysis. Instead of a single definitive impact, quantitative methods help you visualize a range of impacts that can help determine the best risk response strategy.

But as I explain in the post:

…organizations I work with typically have different trouble spots that need to be resolved before they are ready for ERM. Some of these organizations do not have established corporate governance policies, a strategic plan, or even decision-making fundamentals!

Let’s use the analogy of fitness.

Prior to my pregnancy a few years ago, my husband and I decided we wanted to invest more time in getting and staying fit. We began working with a personal trainer who tailored sessions to correspond to our current level of fitness and our goals.

Fast forward nearly 7 years and we’re both still working out, but at a more intense level. Instead of short 30-minute sessions 3 days a week, part of my routine now involves intense athletic training workouts that last for an hour or more.

If I would have started out at this level, I most certainly would have been overwhelmed and failed because I didn’t have the ability, knowledge, endurance, and mindset that I do today.

Many of the quantitative methods Alexei and others talk about can be characterized the same way. Going from nothing to advanced modeling and other math-based methods is a huge jump that many companies are simply not ready for.

Instead of a sudden giant leap forward, the future of risk management should be seen as a journey unique to each organization.

As Alexei explains, correctly in my view, many consultants tend to take a one-size-fits-all approach that tries to pigeon-hole clients into one particular model. Several companies I’ve spoken to in my time as a consultant have sadly been disappointed with results after spending significant sums of money trying to make a square peg fit into a round hole.

Companies who jump heavily into quantitative-based analysis without being ready are at high risk of overwhelm and wasted resources. Many companies simply are not ready for a “probability chart” that shows a range of outcomes they can expect from a given choice, even when I would love for them to use that kind of information for decision-making.

And for some industries, change happens so quickly that it can make re-running models cumbersome and frustrating, even for those who regularly use modeling (like property insurance companies and banks).

Instead of jumping right into modeling, one possibility to start this journey is for executives and the broader company to be more disciplined in their strategic and operational planning by asking challenging questions. Examples can include:

  • What are any internal and external dependencies to achieving this goal?
  • How confident are we that all of those dependencies will be in place when needed?
  • What if one assumption turns out not to be true? How does that impact achieving the goal?

These of course are general questions…there will certainly be relevant company or goal-specific questions that you should develop. For additional examples, check out this previous article on questions to ask during scenario planning.

Although I certainly agree that change must happen in how risks are analyzed and information is distilled to decision-makers, it can also be damaging to assume that there’s only one path to the future of risk management.

Thank you to Alexei and all of the presenters at RAW 2020 for their exhaustive insights into the current state and future of risk management. I look forward to watching more sessions and reporting back in the weeks ahead.

What has been your experience with quantitative risk analysis methods? Has any transition been smooth or has it been overwhelming?

I’m interested in learning more about your experiences, so please don’t hesitate to leave a comment below or join the conversation on LinkedIn.

If your company is trying to understand which tools are best for helping achieve your goals, feel free to contact me through my consulting firm today!

Featured image courtesy of Ali Pazani via Pexels.com

Posted in

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

SDS-Logo
about-sidebar-v2

Meet Carol

Helping companies achieve their vision and strategy, and succeeding in today's turbulent world, is something I'm honored to be a part of. Whether you're an occasional blog visitor or a long-term client, thank you for letting us be a part of your journey.

Most Recent Posts

The 12 Days of ERM Christmas

Without a doubt, one of my family’s favorite holidays is Christmas. Part of the fun, especially for our son, is seeing what “Santa” brought, but most importantly, we treasure the spirit of peace and goodwill the season brings. And after what seemed to be a never-ending warm spell, the weather is expected to be good…

Read More

Don’t Let Goals and Initiatives Be Blindsided by External Events

As the end of the year draws near, I think we’d all agree that while it wasn’t without its challenges, this year also wasn’t quite as turbulent as the previous two. While a lot of people are juggling company parties, shopping for friends and family, and special activities for the kids, most companies are putting…

Read More

Going the Distance: Ensuring Successful Execution of Strategic and Annual Initiatives

Strategic planning is a challenge – of all people, I understand… After all the meetings, risk and data analysis, and brainstorming of the preceding months, it’s tempting to think this is the end of the road and you can relax. Contrary to this common perception though, this is exactly not the time to relax, but…

Read More

Avoid Rookie Mistakes and Protect your Internal Reputation

Be honest – have you ever done something that you soon realized was a real rookie mistake? Me raising my hand… Considering the nature of ERM’s role to ask questions and challenge assumptions (often during conversations with executives), it can be argued that, in at least some cases, the expectations bar for risk professionals is…

Read More

ERM at Thanksgiving – An Illustration of Risk Management in Action

On occasion, I like to take some of the concepts we risk professionals think about in our jobs and apply them to different personal situations…take some of the same concepts we use when working with executives to develop corporate strategy and manage risks or uncertainty around that strategy. It’s Thanksgiving week in the U.S. –…

Read More

Why Quantitative Risk Assessment is Not Just the Best But the Only Option – A Conversation

Periodically, I have the pleasure of speaking one-on-one with Hans Læssøe on a variety of topics around ERM, strategic risk, and other issues and trends. As you know from my previous conversations (here, here) and posts featuring his work, Hans was formerly a practitioner at the iconic LEGO Company, but even more notably, is a…

Read More

The Three Lines Model – 3 Reasons Why I Don’t Like It

Everyone likes a clear-cut template that offers an easy way to create or manage something…I mean what’s not to like about a step-by-step process for accomplishing what you want? Sometimes this can work without any issues, such as the case with the Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK), ISO 9001 standard, or a new cooking…

Read More

5 Avenues for Expanding your ERM Knowledge

One thing I was taught to appreciate from a young age was the value of education and knowledge. It didn’t necessarily matter what the subject was, just that I always maintain a learning or growth mindset regardless of my current status in life. This mindset has served me well over the years, and it’s a…

Read More

Storytelling and Risk Management – Developing Skills that Technology Cannot Replace

It’s amazing how technology has developed and changed our working world over time. Imagine trying to run my risk and strategy consulting firm without tools like Zoom, Box, Slack, and other ERM-specific technology tools. There is no way we would be able to serve our clients the way that we do. Just consider how the…

Read More

3 Phases to Creating and Launching an ERM Program Focused on Organizational Success

If you’ve been handed the task of creating an ERM program for your organization, let me first offer my congratulations quickly followed by my empathy for the task ahead of you. I don’t say that to scare you but to provide a small dose of reality. Building, launching, and refining an ERM program that is…

Read More