“A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.”
We’ve all heard this idiom that first appeared in Thomas Reid’s “Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man” published in 1786. The phrase is commonly used to describe organizations or groups and how they are only as strong as the weakest or laziest member.
By extension, this idiom is especially true when it comes to strategic decisions and corporate strategy.
While there can be dozens or even hundreds of possibilities, a common “weak link” many organizations struggle with is when decision-makers do NOT involve implementers when making strategic decisions.
Executives and planning personnel develop a corporate strategy, and everything looks great – on paper.
However, what happens too often is these same people responsible for making these decisions fail to consult with the people who will be responsible for implementing the plans. This, of course, creates additional risks to the successful achievement of the organization’s goals.
Examples of these additional risks include (but are definitely not limited to):
- Resources/people are not available because of previous commitments.
- Unknown dependencies require initiatives to take a pause to wait for something to be done.
- A change in approach is needed once additional details come to light after the initiative is underway.
- Price or costs are higher than initially planned (i.e., it’s later determined new or updated software or specialized skills are needed).
At worst, not involving implementers in strategic decisions can end up putting other initiatives and even the entire organization’s success in jeopardy.
Now I don’t want to imply that executives and other leaders can’t have ideas and pursue them. After all, this is what they do, but sometimes in their zeal, they can neglect to take important steps needed to ensure their efforts ultimately succeed.
It may be impractical or impossible to bring implementers in before decisions are made, and an execution strategy is developed. If this is the case, time will need to be factored into that execution strategy to allow implementers the opportunity to gather information and ask questions before taking action.
If executives are not consulting with implementers, you as the risk professional will need to prepare for what might happen. But…
The best way to mitigate risks to the implementation of goals is to encourage executives to make themselves available to implementers during the planning process.
I’ve said it a lot lately, but it bears repeating…uncertainty is getting more intense with each passing day. There are all sorts of risks and uncertainties that can put the kibosh on goals and initiatives. As risk professionals, it’s our job to understand both risks and opportunities and provide management with actionable information and recommendations for making informed decisions.
One way to do this is to encourage executives to make themselves available to those who will be responsible for carrying out the initiatives, allowing the implementers to ask questions and air concerns.
Doing so before any final decisions are made will make decisions stronger and implementation smoother because, as discussed in the book Decision Quality: Value Creation from Better Business Decisions, it allows the implementers to:
- Suggest new alternatives,
- Provide insights and information from their unique perspective,
- Help gather information,
- Evaluate feasibility and identify potential execution failures, and
- Explore and share their perspectives about the decision’s value drivers, thereby preparing to make value-driven decisions during implementation.
In addition to providing additional perspective and information to ensure the best decision possible, implementers need to also understand:
- Why the decision is important,
- Why executives chose the course of action that they did,
- How the decision will benefit the organization,
- What tradeoffs can be made during implementation, and
- What executives expect as a desired outcome from the initiative.
Now this may seem like good enough reasons for executives to begin involving implementers in their decisions if they’re not doing so already, but there’s an additional benefit to convey to executives – improved employee morale.
More and more workers, especially from the “millennial” generation (born roughly between 1982-2000), indicate that salary or benefits is not the primary motivator of their happiness at work. For example, 80% of millennials say that a company culture that emphasizes personal growth is highly important according to this report.
Involving implementers not only improves strategic decisions; it also gives employees a sense of ownership and thus stronger commitment to action and increased morale, or as Decision Quality explains:
Organizations and business scholars have long puzzled over how to incentivize this sense of ownership, which is central to building commitment to action. Stock ownership plans, performance-based pay, and related schemes have all been tried. These have merit, but in the end, monetary rewards matter less to individuals than participating in the decisions that they are asked to implement. Participation engenders a sense of ownership that results in commitment and effectiveness during implementation.
In the long run, commitment to action and improved morale are probably a more important reason than mitigating risks to initiatives as a reason for including implementers in strategic decision-making.
Taking the time to understand implementers concerns and answer their questions will undoubtedly strengthen this weak link that can so easily derail plans and put the company at risk of failure.
If your executives are not speaking with implementers during the planning process, what justification(s) could you provide to get them to change course?
As always, other readers and I are interested in learning more on what other practitioners are doing in these circumstances. Feel free to share your thoughts by leaving a comment below or join the conversation on LinkedIn.
If your company is struggling to meet goals due to poor decision-making and implementation, please don’t hesitate to reach out to discuss your company’s specific situation and potential options for addressing these challenges.
Featured image courtesy of Joey Kyber via Pexels.com
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Helping companies achieve their vision and strategy, and succeeding in today's turbulent world, is something I'm honored to be a part of. Whether you're an occasional blog visitor or a long-term client, thank you for letting us be a part of your journey.
Most Recent Posts
Without a doubt, one of my family’s favorite holidays is Christmas. Part of the fun, especially for our son, is seeing what “Santa” brought, but most importantly, we treasure the spirit of peace and goodwill the season brings. And after what seemed to be a never-ending warm spell, the weather is expected to be good…Read More
As the end of the year draws near, I think we’d all agree that while it wasn’t without its challenges, this year also wasn’t quite as turbulent as the previous two. While a lot of people are juggling company parties, shopping for friends and family, and special activities for the kids, most companies are putting…Read More
Strategic planning is a challenge – of all people, I understand… After all the meetings, risk and data analysis, and brainstorming of the preceding months, it’s tempting to think this is the end of the road and you can relax. Contrary to this common perception though, this is exactly not the time to relax, but…Read More
Be honest – have you ever done something that you soon realized was a real rookie mistake? Me raising my hand… Considering the nature of ERM’s role to ask questions and challenge assumptions (often during conversations with executives), it can be argued that, in at least some cases, the expectations bar for risk professionals is…Read More
On occasion, I like to take some of the concepts we risk professionals think about in our jobs and apply them to different personal situations…take some of the same concepts we use when working with executives to develop corporate strategy and manage risks or uncertainty around that strategy. It’s Thanksgiving week in the U.S. –…Read More
Periodically, I have the pleasure of speaking one-on-one with Hans Læssøe on a variety of topics around ERM, strategic risk, and other issues and trends. As you know from my previous conversations (here, here) and posts featuring his work, Hans was formerly a practitioner at the iconic LEGO Company, but even more notably, is a…Read More
Everyone likes a clear-cut template that offers an easy way to create or manage something…I mean what’s not to like about a step-by-step process for accomplishing what you want? Sometimes this can work without any issues, such as the case with the Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK), ISO 9001 standard, or a new cooking…Read More
One thing I was taught to appreciate from a young age was the value of education and knowledge. It didn’t necessarily matter what the subject was, just that I always maintain a learning or growth mindset regardless of my current status in life. This mindset has served me well over the years, and it’s a…Read More
It’s amazing how technology has developed and changed our working world over time. Imagine trying to run my risk and strategy consulting firm without tools like Zoom, Box, Slack, and other ERM-specific technology tools. There is no way we would be able to serve our clients the way that we do. Just consider how the…Read More
If you’ve been handed the task of creating an ERM program for your organization, let me first offer my congratulations quickly followed by my empathy for the task ahead of you. I don’t say that to scare you but to provide a small dose of reality. Building, launching, and refining an ERM program that is…Read More