Practicing ERM without a Formal ERM Program

Many of the ERM resources you encounter on my blog and elsewhere focus on elements of a formal program like developing a framework, establishing risk appetite, and more. We imply, at least indirectly, that your organization must have this formal structure in place before practicing ERM.

However, this isn’t always the case…

Double-take – why would a consultant say that an organization doesn’t need all of these formal elements in place before practicing ERM?

Although, yes, I need to make a living with my consulting firm, my role isn’t to push one certain way of doing things. Despite what you may hear elsewhere, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to ERM.

There are situations where an organization can practice and benefit from ERM without formalizing the identification, assessment, and analysis of risks…in fact, in certain circumstances, establishing these formalities could end up being a negative.

Successfully practicing ERM without a formal structure boils down to two things – culture and how executives already think about risk…

Are executives already informally discussing and thinking about how risks influence decisions and planning?

Is the organizational culture conducive to open communication?

I think the best way to illustrate how this works is with a real-world example with one of my clients.

When I first came to work with this organization, I learned that executives are already factoring strategic risks (without prompting) into their thinking and that top risks are addressed within the planning process. The conversations among executives and reporting to their Board of Directors occur naturally.

In discussing any existing practices with the organization, we both realized that formalizing their process would only add more work without adding any more value…who would want to do that, right?

However, one thing I did notice was that executives were focusing almost exclusively on what we would deem as “positive” risks or opportunities…the negative or “disruptive” risks were not part of their focus.

Therefore, instead of asking about top risks, I modified my wording slightly to ask about the biggest disruptive risks that would keep them from fulfilling core functions or would otherwise drain resources.

From there, we discussed ways to plan and get in front of disruptive risks with the goal of ensuring the organization was ready to respond to events that were within their control.

I went into this detail about opportunities vs. disruptive risks because the one issue I noticed with this organization was how attention paid to positive vs. negative risks, or opportunities vs. threats, was so out-of-balance.

In order for the organization to realize the benefits of practicing ERM, they needed to balance things out a little bit, hence my slight spin by asking about “disruptive” risks instead of just risks.

Questions to consider when assessing existing practices to see if your organization is a good fit for “informal” ERM

The COSO framework provides some guidance around things organizations should consider when embarking on the ERM journey. While they don’t specifically mention it, many of these points are useful for determining if your organization is a good fit for practicing ERM in an informal way.

At a high level, COSO looks at organizational processes, not the formal elements of an ERM program. Some sample questions include:

  • What is the board’s oversight and does it support management in achieving strategic and business objectives?
  • Does the organization define the type of culture it desires? What is the mindset of the organization related to risk and risk-related topics?
  • How does the organization formulate business objectives? Does it consider risk while establishing business objectives? How well do these objectives align and support strategy?
  • Does the organization identify risks that can impact the performance of strategy and business objectives?
  • How does the organization prioritize risks and how does it identify and select responses?

Notice that these questions do not mention framework, risk committee, or other elements of a formal ERM program.

Check out these articles about fostering a positive risk culture and considerations for board oversight of risk to learn more.

If the organization’s culture, actions, and oversight is conducive to practicing ERM informally, developing a concrete framework would actually negatively influence those natural risk-informed conversations, reporting, and decision-making, making them stilted and sometimes awkward.

And one last thing, when I say “informal” ERM, I don’t mean to infer that there are no standards whatsoever…if you are conducting risk assessments, I highly recommend using some kind of criteria for likelihood and impact. Otherwise, you have no way of ensuring that everyone is on the same page or talking the same “low” or “medium” level of risk.

Has your organization been practicing ERM without a formal program? Have you been able to achieve results and realize value in the absence of a formal ERM structure?

To share your perspective, please leave a comment below or join the conversation on LinkedIn.

If your organization is looking for a way to realize the benefits of practicing ERM but feel like a formal program would add more work without adding that value, please feel free to contact me via phone or email to discuss potential options today!

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Sign Up For Our Newsletter


Meet Carol

Helping companies achieve their vision and strategy, and succeeding in today's turbulent world, is something I'm honored to be a part of. Whether you're an occasional blog visitor or a long-term client, thank you for letting us be a part of your journey.

Most Recent Posts

The 12 Days of ERM Christmas

Without a doubt, one of my family’s favorite holidays is Christmas. Part of the fun, especially for our son, is seeing what “Santa” brought, but most importantly, we treasure the spirit of peace and goodwill the season brings. And after what seemed to be a never-ending warm spell, the weather is expected to be good…

Read More

Don’t Let Goals and Initiatives Be Blindsided by External Events

As the end of the year draws near, I think we’d all agree that while it wasn’t without its challenges, this year also wasn’t quite as turbulent as the previous two. While a lot of people are juggling company parties, shopping for friends and family, and special activities for the kids, most companies are putting…

Read More

Going the Distance: Ensuring Successful Execution of Strategic and Annual Initiatives

Strategic planning is a challenge – of all people, I understand… After all the meetings, risk and data analysis, and brainstorming of the preceding months, it’s tempting to think this is the end of the road and you can relax. Contrary to this common perception though, this is exactly not the time to relax, but…

Read More

Avoid Rookie Mistakes and Protect your Internal Reputation

Be honest – have you ever done something that you soon realized was a real rookie mistake? Me raising my hand… Considering the nature of ERM’s role to ask questions and challenge assumptions (often during conversations with executives), it can be argued that, in at least some cases, the expectations bar for risk professionals is…

Read More

ERM at Thanksgiving – An Illustration of Risk Management in Action

On occasion, I like to take some of the concepts we risk professionals think about in our jobs and apply them to different personal situations…take some of the same concepts we use when working with executives to develop corporate strategy and manage risks or uncertainty around that strategy. It’s Thanksgiving week in the U.S. –…

Read More

Why Quantitative Risk Assessment is Not Just the Best But the Only Option – A Conversation

Periodically, I have the pleasure of speaking one-on-one with Hans Læssøe on a variety of topics around ERM, strategic risk, and other issues and trends. As you know from my previous conversations (here, here) and posts featuring his work, Hans was formerly a practitioner at the iconic LEGO Company, but even more notably, is a…

Read More

The Three Lines Model – 3 Reasons Why I Don’t Like It

Everyone likes a clear-cut template that offers an easy way to create or manage something…I mean what’s not to like about a step-by-step process for accomplishing what you want? Sometimes this can work without any issues, such as the case with the Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK), ISO 9001 standard, or a new cooking…

Read More

5 Avenues for Expanding your ERM Knowledge

One thing I was taught to appreciate from a young age was the value of education and knowledge. It didn’t necessarily matter what the subject was, just that I always maintain a learning or growth mindset regardless of my current status in life. This mindset has served me well over the years, and it’s a…

Read More

Storytelling and Risk Management – Developing Skills that Technology Cannot Replace

It’s amazing how technology has developed and changed our working world over time. Imagine trying to run my risk and strategy consulting firm without tools like Zoom, Box, Slack, and other ERM-specific technology tools. There is no way we would be able to serve our clients the way that we do. Just consider how the…

Read More

3 Phases to Creating and Launching an ERM Program Focused on Organizational Success

If you’ve been handed the task of creating an ERM program for your organization, let me first offer my congratulations quickly followed by my empathy for the task ahead of you. I don’t say that to scare you but to provide a small dose of reality. Building, launching, and refining an ERM program that is…

Read More